"Creation is just religion, it is not science; therefore, it should not be presented as science." (Claim #E755)
Response
- Creationists have scientific arguments
As Christians, we believe the Bible to be the infallible Word of God, and our faith extends so much deeper than scientific arguments. However, we believe that the Bible is supported by science, too—in fact, we believe science supports the biblical model while refuting the evolutionary one. If our arguments are based upon poor science, then refute the arguments themselves on scientific grounds. Do not simply say that all of our scientific arguments are invalid just because we have religious motivations for making them.
– - Many evolutionists are “religiously motivated”
We could turn this argument around and say that many evolutionists have “religious motivations” for accepting evolution. These evolutionists are committed to naturalism, and they are willing to accept evolution even when the evidence does not fit. Examples of Evolutionary Bias
Site Under Construction
This site is still under construction. It needs more references, citations, and debate arguments. If you would like to help, please view the community page.